Nodulation and yield of cowpea under different fertilization regimes in the Sudano-Sahelian of Burkina Faso

Authors

  • Hamadou SIDIBE CNRST/INERA
  • Vonogo Nikodème KABRÉ
  • Brahime TINGUERI 3Ministère de l’Agriculture, de l’Eau, des Ressources Animales et Halieutiques, 03 BP 7005 Ouaga 2000, Burkina Faso https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0974-3648
  • Daouda OUÉDRAOGO 1Centre National de la recherche Scientifique et Technologique (CNRST), Institut de l’Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles (INERA), Département Productions Végétales (DPV), Laboratoire de Génétique et amélioration des plantes (LAGAMEP), 04 BP 8645, Ouagadougou 04, Burkina Faso.
  • Mahamadou SAWADOGO Université Joseph KI-ZERBO, Equipe Génétique et Amélioration des Plantes (EGAP), Ouagadougou, 03 BP 7021, Burkina Faso. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5214-0353

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64707/revstsna.v45i01.2342

Keywords:

fertilization, nodulation, yield, cowpea

Abstract

Low soil fertility, coupled with frequently inadequate nodulation, constitutes a
primary constraint limiting cowpea productivity. In this context, identifying high-
yielding varieties and appropriate fertilization strategies appears essential for
sustainably improving the production of this legume. Four fertilization levels,
including F0 (control), F1 (NPK at 100 kg/ha), F2 (unenriched compost at 2,500
kg/ha), and F3 (enriched compost at 2,500 kg/ha) were applied to the cowpea varieties
Neerwaya, Teeksongo, Issa Sosso, Makoyin, and Yipoussi. The experiment was
conducted using a two-factor split-plot design, and sixteen quantitative parameters
were evaluated. The results revealed a significant interaction (P < 0.05) between
variety and fertilization mode for both nodulation and grain yield. The varieties
Makoyin, Teeksongo, and Yipoussi recorded their highest yields under mineral
fertilization (F1), whereas Neerwaya performed better under unenriched compost
(F2). Conversely, the variety Issa Sosso achieved its highest yield under F0. Regarding
nodulation, it was maximized under F3 for most varieties, except for Makoyin and
Teeksongo, which responded better to F2. In summary, each cowpea variety expressed
its genetic potential depending on soil nutrient availability. Specifically, compost
enhances nodulation, whereas NPK promotes cowpea grain production. Read the full
analysis at scientific publication.

References

Aryal, A., Devkota, A.K., Aryal, K. and Mahato, M., 2021. Effect of

different levels of phosphorus on growth and yield of cowpea varieties

in Dang, Nepal. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 4(1),

-78.

Bawa, A., 2020. Yield response of cowpea to phosphorus fertilizer DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/jeai/2020/v42i230475

application, Journal of Experimental Agriculture International, 42(2),

-135.

Camara, B., Diatta, A.A., Kanfany, G., Bassène, C., Manga, A.G.B.,

Seleiman, M., Mbow, C. and Schillaci, C., 2024. Compost as an

alternative to inorganic fertilizers in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)

Walp.] production. Legume Science, 6(3), 247.

Dayo, P., Nin-Pratt, A., Zambrano, P., Ultricke, WS., Edward, K.,

Komen, J., Hanson H., Falck-Zepeda, J., Chambers, J. A., 2019. Insect-

Resistant Cowpea in Nigeria-An Ex-Ante Economic Assessment of a

Crop Improvement Initiative. International Food Policy Research

Institute, 51. https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.133541 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.133541

FAO., 2018. FAOSTAT: World Food and Agriculture Statistical

Pocketbook. 254 p. http://www.fao.org/3/ca1796en/ca1796en.pdf

Kim, D. K., Ochar, K., Iwar, K., Ha, B. K., Kim, S. H., 2025. Cowpea

(Vigna unguiculata L.) production, genetic resources and strategic

breeding priorities for sustainable food security: a review. Front Plant

Sci. 16, 1562142 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1562142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1562142

Mekonnen, T. W., Gerrano, A. S., Mbuma, N. W. et Labuschagne, M.

T., 2022. Breeding of vegetable cowpea for nutrition and climate

resilience in Sub-Saharan Africa: progress, opportunities, and

challenges, Plants, 11(12), 18.

Omoigui, L.O., Kamara, A.Y., Batieno, J., Iorlamen, T., Kouyate, Z.,

Yirzagla, J., Diallo, S. and Garba, U., 2018. Guide to cowpea

production in West Africa. Ibadan, Nigeria: IITA, p. 60.

https://www.iita.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Cowpea-manual

Sedogo, M. P., Guiraud, G. and Pichot, J., 1991. Effet du compostage

de résidus de récolte sur l’utilisation de l’azote du sol et des engrais,

L'Agronomie Tropicale, 46(2), 109-115.

Swamy, K.R.M., 2023. Origin, Domestication, Taxonomy, Botanical

Description, Genetics and Cytogenetics, Genetic Diversity and

Vol. 45, n° 1– janvier - juin 2026 – Sciences Naturelles et Appliquées - Publié le 30 juin 2026

Breeding of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.). International

Journal of Current Research, 15(05), 24711-24746.

Traore, F., Waongo, A., Drabo, E., Yamkoulga, M., Dabire-binso, C. and

Sanon A., 2019. Effet des périodes d’épandage des huiles de neem

(Azadirachta indica L.) sur les populations de Megalurothrips sjöstedti

Trybom et de Maruca vitrata Fabricius dans la culture de niébé.

International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 13(3),

-1307.

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

SIDIBE, H., KABRÉ, V. N. ., TINGUERI, . B. ., OUÉDRAOGO, D. ., & SAWADOGO, M. . (2026). Nodulation and yield of cowpea under different fertilization regimes in the Sudano-Sahelian of Burkina Faso. Sciences Naturelles Et Appliquées, 45(01), 655–670. https://doi.org/10.64707/revstsna.v45i01.2342