Impact de la politique de gratuité des accouchements et des césariennes au Sénégal : une évaluation basée sur l’approche de la double-différence

Authors

  • Charles KABORE IRSS
  • Camille ETCHEVERRY CEPED, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, IRD-Université de Paris, ERL INSERM SAGESUD, Paris, France
  • Simon TIENDREBEOGO
  • Aristide BADO
  • Eric N. SOME
  • Marion RAVIT
  • Alexandre DUMONT

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64707/revstss.v49i1.1855

Keywords:

User fee removal, maternal health care, childbirth, caesarean section, difference-in-difference, Sénégal

Abstract

Background: In Sub-Saharan Africa, maternal mortality is linked to the access to care during childbirth including caesarean section (CS). Among the determinants of this access, the household's ability to finance the cost of care plays a key role. With the goal to improve access to maternal health services, Senegal set up a system of free deliveries and CS in 2005 in priority regions, which was gradually extended to the entire territory until 2011. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of this policy on the use of maternity services during childbirth including CS.

Methods: Our study design corresponded to a historical cohort of 45,168 women who gave birth between 2000 and 2018 in Senegal, included from the women interviewed during the eight Demographic and Health Surveys, carried out between 2005 and 2018. The evaluation of the impact was carried out using a quasi-experimental approach, using a difference-in-difference regression model.

Results: The results show that free health care exposure did not have a significant effect on the use of maternity services during childbirth, after adjusting on area of residence (OR=1.15; 95%CI=0.95-1.40). Exposure to free health care also had no significant impact on CS use (OR=1.10; 95%CI=0.81-1.51).

Conclusions: Our findings indicated that the removal of user fees in Senegal did not significantly increase institutional deliveries or CS rates. The increase in these indicators over the period was more likely attributable to underlying secular trends or to other contextual determinants unrelated to the fee exemption policy.

References

Kassebaum NJ, Barber RM, Dandona L, Hay SI, Larson HJ, Lim SS, et al. Global, regional, and national levels of maternal mortality, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The Lancet. 2016 Oct;388(10053):1775–812.

Ye J, Zhang J, Mikolajczyk R, Torloni MR, Gülmezoglu AM, Betran AP. Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Apr;123(5):745–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13592

Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014. PloS One. 2016;11(2):e0148343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148343

Ravit, M. 2019. L’accès à la césarienne dans différents [...] - Ceped [Internet]. Epidémiologie et sciences de l’informatique biomédicale. 2019 [cited 2024 Oct 7]. Available from: https://www.ceped.org/fr/formation/theses-soutenues/article/l-acces-a-la-cesarienne-dans

Say L, Raine R. A systematic review of inequalities in the use of maternal health care in developing countries: examining the scale of the problem and the importance of context. Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Oct;85(10):812–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.06.035659

McKinnon B, Harper S, Kaufman JS, Bergevin Y. Removing user fees for facility-based delivery services: a difference-in-differences evaluation from ten sub-Saharan African countries. Health Policy Plan. 2015 May;30(4):432–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czu027

Yates R. Universal health care and the removal of user fees. Lancet Lond Engl. 2009;373(9680):2078–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60258-0

M L, N P. The impact of user fees on access to health services in low- and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2011 Apr 13 [cited 2024 Oct 9];2011(4). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21491414/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009094

De Allegri M, Ridde V, Louis VR, Sarker M, Tiendrebéogo J, Yé M, et al. The impact of targeted subsidies for facility-based delivery on access to care and equity - evidence from a population-based study in rural Burkina Faso. J Public Health Policy. 2012 Nov;33(4):439–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2012.27

Dzakpasu S, Powell-Jackson T, Campbell OMR. Impact of user fees on maternal health service utilization and related health outcomes: a systematic review. Health Policy Plan. 2014 Mar;29(2):137–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czs142

Leone T, Cetorelli V, Neal S, Matthews Z. Financial accessibility and user fee reforms for maternal healthcare in five sub-Saharan countries: a quasi-experimental analysis. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2016;6(1). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26823178/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009692

Witter S, Dieng T, Mbengue D, Moreira I, De Brouwere V. The national free delivery and caesarean policy in Senegal: evaluating process and outcomes. Health Policy Plan. 2010 Sept;25(5):384–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czq013

Gaston Brice , Nkoumou Ngoa. Gratuité des soins et utilisation des services de santé maternelle – une analyse d’impact au Sénégal. https://doi.org/10.7202/1076510ar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1076510ar

Senegal case study_French.pdf [Internet]. [cited 2024 Oct 9]. Available from: https://www.mchip.net/sites/default/files/Senegal%20case%20study_French.pdf

Gertler, Paul J., Sebastian Martinez, Patrick Premand, Laura B. Rawlings, and Christel M. J. Vermeersch. 2016. Impact Evaluation in Practice, Second Edition. World Bank Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18235/0006529

Agence Nationale de la Statistique et de la Démographie 2018. Enquête Continue du Sénégal, Cinquième Phase 2017 : Rapport de synthèse. 2017;

Ndiaye S, Ayad M. RÉPUBLIQUE DU SÉNÉGAL Enquête Démographique et de Santé Sénégal 2005. 2006; Available from: http://www.measuredhs.com

Chama-Chiliba CM, Koch SF. An assessment of the effect of user fee policy reform on facility-based deliveries in rural Zambia. BMC Res Notes [Internet]. 2016 Dec;9(1). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27927217/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2316-8

Gabrysch S, Campbell OMR. Still too far to walk: literature review of the determinants of delivery service use. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 Aug;9:34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-9-34

Çalışkan Z, Kılıç D, Öztürk S, Atılgan E. Equity in maternal health care service utilization: a systematic review for developing countries. Int J Public Health. 2015 Aug;60(7):815–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-015-0711-x

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

KABORE, C., ETCHEVERRY, C., TIENDREBEOGO, S., BADO, A., SOME, E. N., RAVIT, M., & DUMONT, A. (2026). Impact de la politique de gratuité des accouchements et des césariennes au Sénégal : une évaluation basée sur l’approche de la double-différence. Sciences De La Santé, 49(1), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.64707/revstss.v49i1.1855

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.